And no, it wasn't Hannah Giles.
It looks like Georgetown "co-ed" Sandra Fluke isn't a 23-year old law student with an expensive contraceptive habit after all. And no one told you that she was a past president of "Law Students for reproductive Justice". But the Democrats got to play her as a victim card on the Hill recently because, well, that's how Democrats roll.
Jammie Wearing Fool says:
For me the interesting part of the story is the ever-evolving “coed”. I put that in quotes because in the beginning she was described as a Georgetown law student. It was then revealed that prior to attending Georgetown she was an active women’s right advocate. In one of her first interviews she is quoted as talking about how she reviewed Georgetown’s insurance policy prior to committing to attend, and seeing that it didn’t cover contraceptive services, she decided to attend with the express purpose of battling this policy. During this time, she was described as a 23-year-old coed. Magically, at the same time Congress is debating the forced coverage of contraception, she appears and is even brought to Capitol Hill to testify. This morning, in an interview with Matt Lauer on the Today show, it was revealed that she is 30 years old, NOT the 23 that had been reported all along.
In other words, folks, you are being played. She has been an activist all along and the Dems were just waiting for the appropriate time to play her.
Here is some background.
Haven't we had enough of this phony hardcore-activist testimony? When are we going to get representatives even a little bit interested in vetting witnesses?
You know what? Rush was right. She IS a slut. Not because of her sexual proclivities, which may be as phony as her testimony, but because she's eager to sell out your liberties and your religious freedoms to make half of us pay for the other half's sexual activities.
No comments:
Post a Comment